<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liability issues for OER software</title>
	<link>http://rickstafford.jiscinvolve.org/2009/11/19/liability-issues-for-oer-software/</link>
	<description>Just another jiscinvolve.org weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Limitation of Liability in Creative Commons &#171;</title>
		<link>http://rickstafford.jiscinvolve.org/2009/11/19/liability-issues-for-oer-software/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Limitation of Liability in Creative Commons &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rickstafford.jiscinvolve.org/2009/11/19/liability-issues-for-oer-software/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] 20, 2009 &#183; Leave a Comment  Rick Stafford has a new post comparing Creative Commons to the GNU license. Stafford notes software licensed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 20, 2009 &middot; Leave a Comment  Rick Stafford has a new post comparing Creative Commons to the GNU license. Stafford notes software licensed [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christaylor</title>
		<link>http://rickstafford.jiscinvolve.org/2009/11/19/liability-issues-for-oer-software/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>christaylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rickstafford.jiscinvolve.org/2009/11/19/liability-issues-for-oer-software/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hi Rick, thanks for bringing this up. It's been discussed at a number of IPR events and the limitations of the CC licences have been noted, and as you rightly suggest the GNU license will be more suitable.

I have mentioned this in my blog, but looking back it's fairly well buried.

I'm assuming the new JorumOpen interface will allow this as an option but I'll double-check.

Chris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rick, thanks for bringing this up. It&#8217;s been discussed at a number of IPR events and the limitations of the CC licences have been noted, and as you rightly suggest the GNU license will be more suitable.</p>
<p>I have mentioned this in my blog, but looking back it&#8217;s fairly well buried.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming the new JorumOpen interface will allow this as an option but I&#8217;ll double-check.</p>
<p>Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
